Module Not Found

Digi International
May 24, 2014

What I learned about importing modules in ES2015

Written by: Andre LeBlanc, software developer at Accelerated Concepts

So, this started when I ran into a #facepalm moment while working on my first React project. I suddenly got an error message like the one below.

It took me longer than I’d like to admit to figure out the issue causing this error. See if you can spot the culprit in the code below.

import React from react;

import ReactDOM from react-dom;

import App from App;

ReactDOM.render(

<App />,

document.getElementById(root)

);

If you saw the error right away, I’m guessing you’ve run into this before… if you didn’t, you’re not alone. The problem is that my App import should be a relative path with a leading dot-slash ./

import App from ./App;

This fixed my issue and I went on with my day; but, later, I was a little curious about how imports worked. Why can I import modules like react without giving it the path?

Digging In

If you want to follow along to get this error, start by installing create-react-app?—?which, by the way, is amazing. If youre just learning React or starting a new React project, I think this is a great way to start (it abstracts away the build stuff which can be intimidating).

I’m going to start by creating a new react app.

create-react-app react-app

cd react-app

npm start

In src/index.js simply remove the leading ./ from ./App and boom, your browser will show you the same problem I had.

So what gives? Why can we import some modules without providing the path? Well, that happens due to the magic of NodeJS and Webpack. When you use import it is compiled to require by Babel.

Webpack wraps the standard NodeJS require with some additional functionality, but the answer to our question lies in the way NodeJS implements require.

If the module identifier passed to require() is not a native module, and does not begin with /, ../, or ./, then Node.js starts at the parent directory of the current module, and adds /node_modules, and attempts to load the module from that location. Node will not append node_modules to a path already ending in node_modules.

Great, so now we understand why a leading ./ is needed and the mechanism that allows modules in node_modules to be loaded by name. I wasn’t quite satisfied though, and wondered if it is possible to load my own modules by name only.

Remember how I said Webpack wraps require with some additional functionality? Well the part of Webpack that determines what gets exported is the resolve section. To see how create-react-app has its Webpack config structured, you can run npm run eject which is a custom script that will unpack the build configuration into your project’s directory.

You can then check config/webpack.config.dev.js for the resolve section which should look something like this.

resolve: {

fallback: paths.nodePaths,

extensions: [.js, .json, .jsx, ],

alias: { react-native: react-native-web },

}

The part that is interesting is the fallback property. There is a great note in the config that informs the use of this property is to ensure that modules found in node_modules “win” in the case of a name clash. This means that if we add to paths.nodePaths, our application code won’t take precedence over an npm module we’ve loaded with the same name.

Pushing my curiosity a bit further, I decided to add my application’s source to paths.nodePaths. To do this, we just need to look at the config/paths.js file.

var nodePaths = (process.env.NODE_PATH || )

.split(process.platform === win32 ? ; : :)

.filter(Boolean)

.filter(folder => !path.isAbsolute(folder))

.map(resolveApp);

We can see there are two ways of adding to nodePaths.

a) Adding the NODE_PATH environment variable.

export NODE_PATH=src

b) Editing the empty string after NODE_PATH.

var nodePaths = (process.env.NODE_PATH || src)

.split(process.platform === win32 ? ; : :)

.filter(Boolean)

.filter(folder => !path.isAbsolute(folder))

.map(resolveApp);

If you do one of these options and restart your server to rebuild the app, you should see the error go away and the page load. Cool!

We can take this even further and create a new file and import it with just the name.

// ~/src/hello/index.js

import React, { Component } from react

class Hello extends Component {

render() {

return (<p>Hello World</p>)

}

}

export default Hello

// ~/src/App.js

import React, { Component } from react;

import logo from logo.svg;

import App.css;

import Hello from hello

class App extends Component {

render() {

return (

<div className="App">

<div className="App-header">

<img src={logo} className="App-logo" alt="logo" />

<h2>Welcome to React</h2>

</div>

<p className="App-intro">

To get started, edit <code>src/App.js</code> and save to reload.

</p>

<Hello />

</div>

);

}

}

export default App;

Pretty nifty; this means if I have some deeply nested file I don’t have to use really long relative paths aka from ../../../../../module etc. Everything exported in my app will be available as a module from ‘module. However, this also has the downside of potential name-clashing and a performance hit as Webpack now has to look in more places for a module?—?so use discretion on whether or not that is a good idea (the fact that its not a default in create-react-app probably suggests it not being the best idea).

Curiosity Quenched

I learned a good bit by going through that exercise. Hopefully it helps someone… and maybe, just maybe, reduces a #facepalm.

tl;dr

1. Make sure relative paths to code within your app starts with a dot ( ./ or ../ )
2. Webpack wraps the Node.js require functionality which allows you to require node_modules without providing the path.
3. You can load your own components as modules, but doing so may not be the best idea.

Further Reading

NodeJS?—?Modules

https://nodejs.org/api/modules.html

Especially the sections on module loading. Webpack (and other bundlers) seem to be heavily based on the way Node handles module loading.

BabelJS

http://babeljs.io/learn-es2015/

“Allow[s] you to use new syntax, right now without waiting for browser support.” You may notice that Webpack and other docs rarely use the import keyword; this is because it is an ES2015 feature and not fully supported by browsers. Babel handles converting imports to requires and so much more. Their whole site is great and informative, you should definitely look around.